At 14 years old, patient did not qualify for free govt care. As with many of our patients, he was not able to afford treatment and a small medical issue turned into a threat to life and limb, due to lack of care.
In 2014-2015, International Mutual Aid (IMA) responded to Sierra Leone during the West African Ebola epidemic. Now, IMA's clinicians are back, providing primary and emergency healthcare, and living alongside the people of Gbamandu village. Join us as we spend our days treating every imaginable condition: from high-risk pregnancies to typhoid, schistosomiasis, beri-beri, tropical abscesses, river blindness, and neonatal sepsis.
Tuesday, February 17, 2015
Ebola and other medical care work update
Working on Ebola surveillance/treatment/decon, and have transformed a basic maternity/infant care clinic into a full-service free primary care/ER/maternity clinic in the mountains of E Sierra Leone. Starting to see patients who have walked all day to get to us. Malnourished kids, typhoid, ebola, infectious diseases, impressive fungal infections, tropical ulcers, and gangrene. Compound tib-fib yesterday (fortunately there was a well-known local bone-setting herbalist available to work with), great debate over whether to amputate a big toe if govt surgeons are not avail due to Ebola... Just freed a 7 yr old from having 3 seizures/wk with a $2/month script.
Tuesday, February 10, 2015
Thursday, February 5, 2015
Wednesday, February 4, 2015
Sunday, February 1, 2015
Ebola: Dispelling Myths
Last night our expat team joined some local folks for beers
at a friend’s place. We sat outside
until late at night, sipping cold Guinness, with Freetown’s mix of thrumming
generators, blaring horns, and tropical bird calls filling the warm night air. In an effort to halt the spread of Ebola, the
Sierra Leone government has imposed a curfew on motorbike taxis and shops (with
the exception of pharmacies): no business after 1800 on weekdays, or 1200 on
Saturdays. So the former patrons of
small beer stands along the streets have shifted to smaller home-based night-time
gatherings.
This was a worldly bunch, and we swapped tales of
shenanigans in places ranging from Kenya, to India, from Afghanistan to
Antarctica. Most present had traveled
extensively for work or military service.
Eventually, as it often seems to do here, the talk turned to
corruption and exploitation. The people
of Sierra Leone, a small country of 6 million, rich in diamond-bearing
kimberlite, iron ore, uranium ore, and other mineral resources, should enjoy a relatively
comfortable and prosperous existence. Instead,
the vast majority of Sierra Leone’s wealth is funneled out of the country by
international firms, or is sucked up by a small, corrupt local elite
class. Sierra Leone’s living standard is
often contrasted by people here with
conditions in South Africa and Botswana.
In spite of many decades of intensive mineral harvesting, Sierra Leone
remains one of the world’s poorest, least developed countries. Many rural areas have no road access, no
healthcare, and almost no government support.
In the decade since Sierra Leone’s incredibly brutal, diamond-fueled
civil war, millions of dollars worth of international developmental efforts has
done little to change this. It was in
this context that Ebola spread so rapidly once it entered Sierra Leone.
On a positive note, Sierra Leone has wealth that goes far
beyond what lies under its soil. Having
read about the terrible things that happened during the war here, for many
years I have subconsciously pictured
Sierra Leone as a dark, angry, cruel place.
My last personal experience of a (still somewhat active, low-level) recovering
conflict zone was Bougainville and the mainland of PNG. While I met many friendly, good, and kind
people in PNG, in most towns and cities an oppressively dark, angry mood hung in
the air. Smaller islands and villages
were often peaceful and pleasant, but in towns things always seemed just about
to erupt into violence. And several
times they did.
So, subconsciously, I expected a similar mood of repressed
violence in Sierra Leone. So far, that
expectation has been very mistaken. In
spite of what, to me, seem like constant and unforgettable reminders of the
war… a generation that missed schooling, the very common sight of people (often
beggars) who have had one or both hands amputated by RUF or other military
forces- Sierra Leoneans universally assert that people have generally gotten
over the war and moved on. While people
are often willing to talk about their experiences, reference events of the war,
and relate items such as Foday Sankoh’s imprisonment and death (with a bit of justifiable
relish), on an emotional level this really does seem to be true- the people
I’ve spoken with in Freetown have gotten over the war and the anger is gone. Far from gloomy and dangerous, Freetown has
one of the safest and friendliest atmospheres I’ve encountered in a developing
world city. There is certainly anger
here, but it seems to be mostly directed in potentially constructive
directions, such as against the slowness of the EVD response, government
corruption, and the funneling of resources out of the country.
One of the best, most promising things about Sierra Leone
society is its religious tolerance. At a
time when religious-based violence seems to be erupting in the rest of the
world, in Sierra Leone Muslim and Christian communities intermingle in
harmony. While the radio news talks
about IS, Boko Haram, AQ, Yemen, Charlie Hebdo, and anti-Muslim protests in
Europe, in Sierra Leone Christians greet Muslim friends and neighbors with
“Salaam Alaykam”, and Muslims thank Christians with “God Bless”. In the evening Muslims and Christians mingle
freely over coffee or drinks, and In the newspapers Muslim and Christian advice
columns run side-by-side. Local friends
note proudly that even during the war, vicious as it was, attempts to divide
communities based on religious affiliations were not successful.
Part of the reason for this religious tolerance is that
Islam and Christianity in Sierra Leone are overlain onto an older set of
indigenous beliefs and very intact social power structures, such as secret
societies. Nearly every man and woman in
Sierra Leone is initiated during adolescence into a secret society – “Poro” for
men, “Bundu” for women. These societies
are a powerful force in Sierra Leone.
Upcounty (in rural areas), where government presence is thin, the Poro
and Bundu provide key community services such as cleaning and maintenance of
communal lands and buildings, and civil defense during the war.
One topic that we all spent a long time discussing last
night was Ebola rumors. Some of these
may seem pretty far-fetched to Westerners.
Upcountry, western medicine is often unavailable. When available, basic medical services may be
offered by a competent practitioner. Or
they may be offered by a traveling profiteer, with minimal training, who passes
off placebos as antibiotics, or worse. Government presence in such places is often
minimal, and the main contact with foreigners is with those involved in reaping
the country’s natural resources, with minimal resultant gain for local people. So
naturally, people may have limited faith in westerners and western medicine,
and instead tend to rely on local spiritual/natural healers who have
established reputations in the community.
Often, illnesses and deaths are ascribed to some sort of transgression
on the part of the sufferer, or to witchcraft.
Part of the upcountry Mende beliefs is the existence of a nocturnal,
technologically advanced world of witches.
One persistent upcountry rumor blames Ebola on the overflight or crash
of several witch airplanes into the remote forests of northern Sierra Leone,
resulting in the curse of Ebola spreading there.
The plane rumor is generally disparaged by educated people
in Freetown. But Freetown has its own
Ebola rumors. Like some people in the
US, some people in Freetown wonder whether Ebola is airborne. This rumor is pretty easy to dispel by going
into the nature of PPE used for Ebola, and contrasting Ebola’s spread with the
spread rate of diseases that are actually airborne, such as flu, TB, SARS,
etc.
Others rumors are trickier.
And the more you think about them, the more you realize some could be
pretty easily to rationally wonder about, if you were coming from a Sierra
Leonean background. For example, we were asked if Ebola could have been created in a lab, as a weapon, and
released here accidentally, or as a test.
This may seem highly implausible to the average American, but imagine
that you live in Freetown.
You live in a country that should be the Switzerland of West
Africa. Instead, most of the wealth is
funneled out of the country by forces you can’t control. How far-fetched would one more form of
exploitation seem to you in that situation?
You have a fairly free press and BBC radio, but limited
access to the internet. Much of the real
news in the country is spread through acquaintance networks. Much of real business in your country, and
real actions of the government, go on behind the scenes. You tend to trust information from
acquaintances more than the official line.
Perhaps you have a trusted acquaintance or two that believes Ebola is
airborne, or made in a lab, and they make convincing arguments to support their
theory. You don’t have a computer
sitting in your living room or a mental database of trustworthy online
scientific information resources to consult on the pathology of the virus, so
it’s up to you to evaluate the soundness of the arguments your friend is
making. Your country lacks the sort of large,
powerful, trusted civil society and legal rights organizations that can help to
provide power checks on government in, say, the US. Sometimes bad things happen, and there isn’t
always accountability afterwards.
You know that biological weapons accidents have occurred in
the past, for example in the Soviet Union, and that there were attempted
cover-ups.
Your friends are asking why the US military is putting so
much money into the Ebola response in Liberia.
Unlike in recent US history, unbelievably terrible things
have happened on a large scale in recent Sierra Leone history. This stretches the boundaries of plausibility
a bit.
You are told that this is not a new virus, that it’s the
same one that’s been studied for decades in central Africa. But you know that it has never spread as a
large-scale epidemic before. Why now?
You are told not to eat bush meat, but you know bush meat
animals in West Africa have been linked to central Africa by a corridor of
rainforest for centuries. Bush meat has
been eaten for centuries, why has Ebola migrated to Western Africa only now?
You see your country’s top doctors, CEOs of banks, and other
powerful people dying. The death rate of
infected in your country is 60-70% even with treatment. Yet, when westerners are infected, they are
transported overseas and, mysteriously, they all survive (except 2 elderly
Spanish missionaries). This could easily
be misinterpreted as proof of a secret cure.
Now, to me, this is simple racism and selfishness. But it is not necessarily that easy to
convince a Sierra Leonean person that no, there is no secret, proven cure, and
yes, the world is just simply too selfish to treat non-citizen Ebola patients
in developed-world medical facilities.
The world is spending massive amounts of money on fighting Ebola, but the
facilities that actually save lives are almost all standing by, empty, in the
developed world. Sierra Leone is a
country that absolutely can’t afford to lose medical personnel. For example, it only has lost 20% of its
surgeons to Ebola; leaving 8 surviving surgeons to treat a country of 6
million. Only one of these is under 60
years of age. The doctor I’m staying
with is nearly 80, and would like to retire, but is delaying retirement because
he is so badly needed. Sierra Leone docs
who risk themselves to treat patients should be guaranteed a quick evac to Emory
et al, for best possible treatment. Its
hard to sit down with people who are taking terrible risks to help their
countrymen and explain why that hasn’t happened.
To my mind, the best way to dispel such myths is to sit down,
share views, and have a respectful, open discussion with those individuals who
the community looks to for wisdom and information. Some of what I feel are our most effective
arguments against Ebola rumors:
Describing the virus itself in layman’s terms helps people
understand how to avoid it, i.e. it’s a bunch of genetic code (like the letters
in a book) wrapped in a rather thin layer of fat… a virus’s only job is to
inject that book of code into a human cell, so that the cell is forced to copy
it and make more viruses… the Ebola virus’s layer of enveloping fat can be
destroyed by thorough washing with soap, bleach, or alcohol hand cleaner, and
the genetic code that’s left over falls apart.
Shred a book and try to read it… you can’t. Ebola doesn’t persist in air or in the
environment because it can’t hang in the air like TB does, and on a surface
sunlight and air destroys it within 15 min- to a few hours, depending on amount
of contamination and environmental conditions.
Those who are ill with Ebola don’t tend to shed large amounts of virus
until they are visibly very ill, with limited mobility, or deceased.
Explaining the oldness and relative genetic stability of the
Ebola virus (in layman’s terms)
Ebola’s inefficacy as a weapon (not readily dispersable as
an aerosol, doesn’t survive transport, doesn’t endure in the environment, the
fact that there is no cure, etc)
Human decency - The EVD epidemic has been so bad (21,000/+
infected) that if it was intentionally caused, at least one of the people
involved in such a project would probably have been guilt-stricken enough to
come forward with concrete evidence.
That kind of revelation would be a NYTimes front page piece, not a
National Enquirer piece. Same story if
there was actually a large stock of a proven cure available.
Describing central African cultural traditions which have
limited the scale of Ebola outbreaks there, versus some West African traditions
which have served to spread it here
Thoroughly describing treatment procedures in the US and the
fact that even those treated in the US get terribly ill before recovering
Describing the limitations of potential cures under
development
Sharing the fact that the first vaccine test groups were
American volunteers in the DC area (which a couple of our team members offered themselves as volunteers for),
and Canadian volunteers in Canada. Describe vaccine testing process and projected
available doses. With encouraging test
results and millions of doses already produced, the vaccine (probably the ultimate
large-scale EVD solution) seems to be a much less prominent part of local
discussions than are potential cures (not going to be a large-scale solution for
West Africans- especially in remote areas- any time soon, if ever).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)